Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)
was materialized in the West in the 1960s and has extended to the Eastern
countries over the last 20 years. Since then, CLT principles have formed the
foundation of English language syllabi for countries such as Senegal. In Senegal,
CLT was adopted as early in the 1990s. Before CLT was introduced, the
structural syllabus was the mainstream approach in most countries settings
including Senegal. Yalden (1987:61) summarized the essence of CLT thus:
It is based on the notion of the
learners as communicators, naturally endowed with the ability to learn
languages. It seeks to provide learners with the target language system. It is
assumed that learners will have to prepare to use the target language (orally
and in written form) in many predictable and unpredictable acts of
communication which arise both in classroom interaction and in real-world situations, whether
concurrent with language training or subsequent to it.
Unfortunately, in Senegal ,linguistic
competence or its components is still being taught by using the old methods
.teachers generally think that teaching grammar ,syntax or lexis is giving the students
lists of rules and sentences with abstract terminologies for them to learn them by
heart. That is why, Language exploitation may not offer a real
reflection of the learner’s underlying knowledge of the language. What makes it
more difficult or unrealistic is, also that in most case, teachers teach
grammar as explicit as possible and treat it in separate course when it should have been
embedded into a general language course and especially into meaningful
context. Language is context dependant. Without the context language would
simply be spoken in a vacuum.
There are many problems in developing
language proficiency as we just saw ,as we know most English teachers had not
been trained up to this method of CLT or they found it very difficult to
implement and in our national syllabus(enseignement
moyen et secondaire ,programmes de L.V. ANGLAIS,3em edition revue et corrigée
b.a ,fevrier 2003https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzoEemyoa6HCV01BdEk3OVFfeE0/edit?usp=sharing) it is mentioned that :the English secondary school curriculum
subscribes to the communicative language teaching approach .
The communicative method is not very
easy to implement because it demands lot of sacrifices in terms of time
consuming and lack of material for both teachers and learners, but language is
not easy to teach and being in an E .F. L context does not make it easy because
teachers must be very skillful and show abnegation.
I realy appreciate this article. These days people are talking solely about dôme basic aspects of CLT un seminars workshops and the like while the core matter of the issue (implenting clt) has not been set yet. We must dare to question what is being done here and there and stop behaving as if everything was fine. We, teachers should tailor our classroom practices to clt principles.
ReplyDeleteBesides it should be understood that teaching in a clt context doesn't mean a total rejection of other approaches.But it goes without saying that the latters are just auxilliaries to call on whenever its necessary. A colleague From the North